瑜伽論記 19.453

19.453

第六經云：等隨觀色乃至識有無常耶等者，定心平等，隨境觀色乃至識有無常，無常言是隱密故。論主釋云：所計常性色遍計等說，無常故依相無性說，何者論主欲釋經語，經語顛倒可言常無有故，以於依他色等上遍計常，故云常無，然即彼經欲說等隨觀五蘊常無有故。

The sixth sūtra says: 'Evenly contemplating whether form up to consciousness is impermanent or not, etc.' This means that with an equanimous mind in samādhi, one follows the objects and contemplates whether form up to consciousness is impermanent, because the word 'impermanence' has a hidden intent. The author of the treatise explains: With respect to form, etc., falsely conceptualized as having a permanent nature, one speaks of impermanence based on the lack of nature of characteristics. Why? The author of the treatise intends to explain the words of the sūtra; because the words of the sūtra inverted [the phrasing] and could say 'permanently non-existent,' since permanence is falsely conceptualized upon paratantra form and so forth, it is called 'permanently non-existent'; yet that sūtra itself intended to say that one evenly contemplates the five aggregates as permanently non-existent.