瑜伽論記 19.476

19.476

第三門中，染為遍計所執，淨為圓成實，依他性者，即通染淨。故論云：若緣遍計所執此識應成染，若緣圓成實此識應成淨，是故染為遍計所執，淨為圓成實，能染依他即通染淨，既有三門。依瑜伽文，但初門是餘二即非，以新譯經論上下但有情事門問答，爾者依後二門所引。

In the third gate, defilement is parikalpita, purity is pariniṣpanna, and the paratantra nature is common to both defilement and purity. Therefore the treatise says: If taking the parikalpita as an objective condition, this consciousness should become defiled; if taking the pariniṣpanna as an objective condition, this consciousness should become pure. Therefore defilement is parikalpita, purity is pariniṣpanna, and that which is capable of defilement, the paratantra, is common to both defilement and purity. Since there are three gates, based on the text of the Yogācāryabhūmi, only the first gate is correct while the remaining two are not, because throughout the newly translated sūtras and treatises there are only questions and answers on the gate of sentiment and fact. Then regarding what is cited based on the latter two gates: