瑜伽論記 19.479

19.479

備云：凡辨三性經論不同，且略分別作九門解。一、名義淨門，如中邊論說：諸法名者是分別性，唯由義執名為實所目法者，是依他性，四種清淨是真實性。二、義名淨門，如攝論說：所目義是分別性，謂依名執名下義為實能目名是依他性。故論云：顯名是依他顯義是分別，四種清淨是真實性。三、塵識門，如楞伽經說：五法藏中，相名二種名分別性，妄想一種名依他性，正智如如名真實性。四、情事理門，如佛性論說：分別性者於五事中不攝，以情計有而無事體故，相名分別正智四法名依他，真如一法名真實性。五、末本淨門，如攝論說：一切染法是分別性，阿賴耶識是依他性，四種清淨是真實性。六、情染淨門，如攝論中引毘佛略經說：如偈云：幻等頌依他，說無頌分別，說四種淨，當知是真實。七、染通淨門，如攝論中引阿毘達磨經，如金藏立等喻。八、諦理通門，如中邊論及涅槃經說：四諦皆通三性。九、通別相門，如三無性論及顯揚論說：能言所言相名通三性，能言所言攝屬性是遍計所執性，執著相，是依他起性，無執著相，是真實。

Bei says: Generally, when discerning the three natures, the scriptures and treatises differ; for now, they are briefly distinguished and explained in nine approaches. 1. The approach of name, referent, and purity: as the Madhyāntavibhāga says, names of dharmas are the nature of discrimination; grasping a name as real solely on the basis of its referent, that denoted dharma is the paratantra nature; the four kinds of purity are the real nature. 2. The approach of referent, name, and purity: as the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says, the denoted referent is the nature of discrimination, meaning that relying on the name one grasps the referent under the name as real; the denoting name is the paratantra nature. Thus the treatise says that manifest name is paratantra and manifest referent is discrimination, and the four kinds of purity are the real nature. 3. The approach of object and consciousness: as the Laṅkāvatārasūtra says, within the storehouse of the five dharmas, the two kinds of marks and names are termed the nature of discrimination; the one kind of false discrimination is termed the paratantra nature; correct wisdom and suchness are termed the real nature. 4. The approach of imagination, actual phenomena, and principle: as the Buddhagotrashāstra says, the nature of discrimination is not subsumed among the five actualities, because it is imagined to exist but lacks an actual substance; the four dharmas of marks, names, discrimination, and correct wisdom are termed paratantra; the single dharma of tathatā is termed the real nature. 5. The approach of branch, root, and purity: as the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says, all defiled dharmas are the nature of discrimination, the ālayavijñāna is the paratantra nature, and the four kinds of purity are the real nature. 6. The approach of imagination, defilement, and purity: as the Mahāyānasaṃgraha cites from the Vaipulyasūtra, as the verse says: 'Illusion and so forth praise paratantra; teaching non-existence praises discrimination; teaching the four kinds of purity, one should know, is the real.' 7. The approach of defilement pervading purity: as in the Mahāyānasaṃgraha's quotation of the Abhidharmasūtra, such as the analogy of the gold deposit, etc. 8. The approach of the truth-principles pervading: as the Madhyāntavibhāga and the Nirvāṇasūtra say, the four truths all pervade the three natures. 9. The approach of common and distinct marks: as the Sanwuxing lun and the Prakaraṇāryavācā say, that which speaks, that which is spoken of, marks, and names pervade the three natures; the nature of the mutual subsumption of that which speaks and that which is spoken of is the parikalpita-svabhāva; the mark of adherence is the paratantrasvabhāva; the mark of non-adherence is the real.