瑜伽論記 19.519

19.519

先釋其理有三。若離名言於諸事中不生喜樂，若名言俱於事方生喜樂，若生喜樂是即於事名言所縛，是一道理。又復名義展轉相依，如先依事起名分別，即是依事名言得生。如靜慮者乃至事可得生者，由彼意識思惟名故作青黃等觀，遂有青黃影像事起，是即依名事得生起，是第二理。

First, in explaining the reasons, there are three. If apart from verbal designations, fondness and joy do not arise toward entities, whereas if accompanied by verbal designations, fondness and joy only then arise toward entities; if fondness and joy arise, then one is bound by verbal designations toward entities: this is the first reason. Furthermore, names and referents are mutually dependent; just as one first relies on entities to give rise to conceptual discrimination of names, this is verbal designation being able to arise reliant on entities. As for "like a meditator... entities can arise," because that mental consciousness contemplates names and engages in the visualization of blue, yellow, and so forth, there consequently arise the entity-images of blue and yellow; this is entities being able to arise reliant on names: this is the second reason.