瑜伽論記 19.522

19.522

下引喻例。又如異生於蘊了知皆無有我，非不於彼我執隨轉，良由來斷我隨眠故，此舉喻也。雖復了知名言假立，而於相中為名言縛，亦由未斷名隨眠故也。

Below, an analogy is adduced to parallel it: Furthermore, just as ordinary beings, regarding the aggregates, clearly know that all are devoid of a self, yet it is not the case that grasping at a self does not continue to operate with respect to them, truly because they have not yet severed the latent propensity to selfhood—this adduces the analogy. Although one also clearly knows that verbal designations are provisionally established, yet among marks one is bound by verbal designations, also because one has not yet severed the latent propensity to names.