瑜伽論記 2.147

2.147

解云：如計我論依我見起，斷見論常論依邊見起，計最勝論計清淨論通依見取戒取起，亦可最勝論雖計最勝，而不取於見故非見取，是邪見攝，餘論皆依邪見起，但合四見不攝者皆是邪見，邪見最寬，非唯謗無，不同小論。

The explanation says: Such as the doctrine positing a self arises based on the view of a self; the doctrine of annihilation and the doctrine of permanence arise based on extreme views; the doctrine positing the supreme and the doctrine positing purification arise generally based on clinging to views and clinging to precepts and vows—alternatively, although the doctrine positing the supreme posits the supreme, it does not attach to a view, so it is not clinging to views and is subsumed under wrong view; the other doctrines all arise based on wrong view. Whatever is not subsumed by the combination of the four views is wrong view; wrong view is the broadest, and does not merely deny existence, unlike [the definition in] the Hīnayāna treatises.