瑜伽論記 2.201

2.201

第三難亦二：一、破應是常，量云：住未來世與現在為緣之法應是常住，不遷流故，如無為法；二、應本無今生、非未來法生，謂若彼為緣，而得生者，便異法生，非未來生，此於未來便為未有，量云：現在應非未來法生，未來中無故，猶如過去。

The third challenge also has two parts: 1. Refuting that it should be permanent. The syllogism is: The dharma that abides in the future time and serves as a condition for the present should be permanent, because it does not transition, like unconditioned dharmas. 2. It should originally not exist and now arise, and not be the arising of a future dharma: that is, if it arises by having that as a condition, then a different dharma arises, not the future dharma arising, so this would be non-existent in the future. The syllogism is: The present should not be arisen from a future dharma, because it does not exist within the future, just like the past.