瑜伽論記 2.310

2.310

若依斷邊際求世邊時等者，此視壞劫開斷之時，不見後成便起邊相，非我後生故非邊見，若見成劫不見壞時起無邊想，若依十方周廣求時，於上下處所見極邊際起亦有邊想，傍運神通至一二千界不至三千，謂其無邊起亦無邊想，由異生類神境智通不越三千故也，八十七說與此不同。彼云：若時憶念成劫分位，爾時便生三種妄想，若一向憶上下邊際住有邊想，若一向憶傍無邊際住無邊想，若下上及傍二俱雙憶起亦有邊亦無邊，若時憶念壞劫分位起非有邊非無邊想，諸器世間無所得，故各舉一執，亦不相違。

Under "If, relying on the limit of cessation, one seeks the end of the world...": this refers to observing the time when the kalpa of destruction breaks off; not seeing subsequent formation, one then conceives the mark of finitude. Because the self will not be born later, it is not a view of finitude. If one sees the kalpa of formation and does not see the time of destruction, one conceives the notion of infinitude. If, relying on the ten directions, one seeks all around: seeing the extreme limit in the upper and lower regions, one conceives the notion of also being finite; extending supernormal powers horizontally to one or two thousand worlds but not reaching three thousand, assuming it to be infinite, one conceives the notion of also being infinite. This is because the knowledge of the supernormal powers of ordinary beings does not exceed three thousand [worlds]. Fascicle eighty-seven explains this differently. It says: "When one recollected the state of the kalpa of formation, at that time three kinds of false notions arose: if one exclusively recollected the upper and lower limits, one abided in the notion of finitude; if one exclusively recollected the horizontal infinity, one abided in the notion of infinitude; if one recollected both the lower/upper and the horizontal together, one gave rise to [the notion of] both finite and infinite; when one recollected the state of the kalpa of destruction, one gave rise to the notion of neither finite nor infinite." Because nothing is apprehended in the physical worlds, each citing one attachment does not contradict the other.