瑜伽論記 2.361

2.361

戒取中，即於彼見，彼見隨行者，景云：即彼取戒禁之見，彼見所緣名為隨行，此見亦取諸見。然多緣戒禁名戒禁取，戒禁何別？或佛法所受名戒，外道所受名禁；或根本名戒方便名禁；或性戒名戒遮戒名禁。備云：防非名戒制惡名禁，義別體一。基云：由諸戒取，依前見取妄執戒禁，為勝能淨，故言於彼見。於者依義，非執彼見為戒取也，執隨順彼見所受，戒禁相應蘊等為勝能淨，故言彼見隨行；或於彼見即前見體，彼見隨行則見相應，於者依義，依見及隨行所受戒禁執之為勝淨，名戒禁取。

Under clinging to precepts, "taking that view and what conforms to that view": Jing says: That very view that clings to precepts and prohibitions, and the objects of that view, are called what conforms to it. This view also grasps various views, yet because it mostly takes precepts and prohibitions as its object, it is called clinging to precepts and prohibitions. What is the difference between precepts and prohibitions? Precepts are what are received in the Buddha's Dharma, while prohibitions are what are received by non-Buddhists; or, precepts are fundamental and prohibitions are expedient means; or, precepts are precepts by nature and prohibitions are prescriptive precepts. Bei says: Preventing wrongdoing is called precepts; curbing evil is called prohibitions—their senses differ, but their essence is one. Ji says: Because various clingings to precepts rely on the preceding clinging to views to falsely grasp precepts and prohibitions as supreme and capable of purifying, it says 'taking that view.' 'Taking' has the sense of relying upon; it does not mean grasping that view as clinging to precepts. Grasping the aggregates and so forth associated with the precepts and prohibitions received in conformity with that view as supreme and capable of purifying, it therefore says 'what conforms to that view.' Alternatively, 'that view' is the essence of the preceding view itself, and 'what conforms to that view' is what is associated with the view: 'taking' has the sense of relying upon, and relying on the view and what conforms to it, grasping the received precepts and prohibitions as supreme and pure is called clinging to precepts and prohibitions.