瑜伽論記 2.6

2.6

謂釋論破第二師云：已離欲者，下地諸法名無尋伺等；未離欲者，上地諸法應名有尋有伺等，由此應成雜亂過去。測法師云：又助難，若依離欲立三地者，中間根本同縛同離應成一地，有雜亂過。

Namely, the Commentary refutes the second master, saying: For one who is already free from desire, the factors of the lower stages would be named [the stage] without investigation and reflection, and so forth; for one not yet free from desire, the factors of the higher stages should be named [the stage] with investigation and with reflection, and so forth; hence the error of confusion would result. Master Ce states: As a further objection, if the three stages are established on the basis of freedom from desire, then the intermediate and fundamental [absorptions], sharing the same bondage and the same freedom, should become a single stage, which entails the error of confusion.