瑜伽論記 2.84

2.84

問：若以此文，即證遊戲妄念，意相憤怨遍，在空居四天者，何故對法第三明二十四已生中說，清淨已生者，謂遊戲妄念意相憤怨，樂變化天、他化、自在天、色無色界諸天多放逸，故隨其所應於所受用境及所住定自在而轉；不清淨已生者，謂彼所餘。

Question: If one takes this passage to prove that playful negligence and mutual wrath universally exist in the four heavens dwelling in the sky, why does fascicle three of the Abhidharma, in clarifying the twenty-four kinds of 'already-born', state: 'pure already-born' refers to playful negligence, mutual wrath, the gods who delight in transformations, the gods who control transformations made by others, and the gods of the form and formless realms, who are largely negligent, and who thus freely operate according as appropriate regarding their enjoyed objects and the dhyānas they abide in; 'impure already-born' refers to the rest?