瑜伽論記 20.24

20.24

備云：此辨由有二種執故有所執遍計性。西方一解：以所執自性為遍計性，若能緣心一向依他，是故此文中重舉能計依他顯所執性，此中地前解名言有情所執，故云隨覺，不能語言眾生所執起雖無現行緣名言心，而由隨眠解青等法，故名串習氣。

Bei says: This distinguishes that because there are two kinds of grasping, there is the grasped parikalpita nature. One Western explanation holds: Taking the grasped intrinsic nature as the parikalpita nature, if the cognitive mind that grasps is exclusively paratantra, then in this passage it repeatedly brings up the paratantra that conceptualizes in order to reveal the grasped nature. Here, the grasping of sentient beings who understand nominal conventions prior to the [bodhisattva] stages is called 'conforming to cognition'; as for the grasping arisen in beings incapable of language, although there is no active mind taking nominal conventions as an object, yet through dormant tendencies they comprehend blue and other dharmas, hence it is called 'habitual conditioning'.