瑜伽論記 24.77

24.77

第三復次云：又若於其所受學處，有堅固執乃至能焚滅故，堅固執人身如葦舍，少有善法如在舍虫，固執邪見如火燒滅舍及善根。即此補特伽羅乃至退失功德善法者，三藏解云：聞思修慧名堅固執，能治前火，有前執火人無聞思修堅固執，退失功德也。與此相違，當知出離等者，與前無聞思修人相違，當知出離邪執，即見無恚無害等，三藏云：應言與此相違如其所應當知出離，無恚害出前相違之法故。上來三段解相見竟。

The third alternative explanation says: 'Furthermore, if with respect to the trainings one has undertaken, there is firm clinging... up to being able to burn and destroy them': the body of a person with firm clinging is like a reed hut; the small amount of wholesome dharmas is like an insect inside the hut; firm clinging to wrong views is like a fire burning and destroying the hut and the wholesome roots. 'This person... up to degenerating from merits and wholesome dharmas': the Tripiṭaka Master explains: Wisdom arisen from hearing, reflection, and cultivation is called firm clinging, which can counter the aforementioned fire; a person who has the aforementioned fire of clinging lacks the firm clinging of hearing, reflection, and cultivation, and degenerates from merits. 'Contrary to this, it should be known that renunciation...': contrary to the aforementioned person lacking hearing, reflection, and cultivation, one should know renunciation of wrong clinging, which is seeing non-malice, non-harm, and so forth. The Tripiṭaka Master says: It should read 'contrary to this, according to what is appropriate, one should know renunciation', because non-malice and non-harm renounce the aforementioned contrary dharmas. The three sections above explaining the marks of views are concluded.