瑜伽論記 24.96

24.96

八、又彼諸受，應知略有三種寂靜已下，解寂靜。樂言論者，第二重解寂靜，景師云：此文分明證在定時有細尋。三藏每云在方便有尋伺入定則無，故在定有但是方便，不在根本。今此文說定中有細尋伺，不言根本及與方便，道通得有，理亦無妨。達師云：三藏會通此文約方便定為論。我所論者，約根本定為言也。

Eighth, from "Furthermore, regarding those feelings, it should be known that in brief there are three kinds of quiescence" downward, it explains quiescence. Regarding "delighting in discourse," this is the second repeated explanation of quiescence. Master Jing says: "This text clearly proves that there is subtle investigation during absorption. The Tripiṭaka Master always said that there is investigation and reflection in the preliminary preparation, but when entering absorption there is none; therefore, having them in absorption is merely preliminary preparation, not in the fundamental [absorption]. Now this text says that there are subtle investigation and reflection in absorption, without specifying fundamental or preliminary preparation; since the path can broadly have them, in principle there is also no contradiction." Master Da says: "The Tripiṭaka Master reconciled this text by addressing the preliminary absorption. What I discuss is stated with regard to the fundamental absorption."