瑜伽論記 9.280

9.280

第三如實中，景云：言如實通違至而似彼事自性顯現者，明彼依他猶如幻化非有似有，故云非彼自性，似彼自性。亦可依他因緣生法非彼凡情執實自性而似於彼執實自性，故云非彼自性，似自性。

Regarding the third accurate cognition, Jing says: The phrase from 'accurately penetrating' up to 'yet manifesting resembling that thing's intrinsic nature' explains that the dependent is like an illusion or magical transformation, non-existent yet resembling existence; hence it says 'not that intrinsic nature, yet resembling that intrinsic nature.' It can also mean that the phenomena arisen from causes and conditions in the dependent are not the real intrinsic nature grasped by worldly ordinary sentiment, yet they resemble that grasped real intrinsic nature; hence it says 'not that intrinsic nature, yet resembling intrinsic nature.'