瑜伽論記 9.83

9.83

一解：由法執體故，不可前事，即名事中無知。二解：法執自是異熟生，顯執法體用，事中無知汎據餘心，如不解了威儀工巧。或復不知大地厚薄山量高下大海深淺，皆是事無知，未必堅執有其法執。又後法執若望二乘是無記性，如貪瞋等煩惱起時貪自貪愛，即有法愛了前法，瞋等亦爾，雖同時起即有不善無記性異。

One explanation states: Because of the substance of dharma-grasping, one cannot comprehend the antecedent phenomena; this is precisely called ignorance regarding phenomena. A second explanation states: Dharma-grasping is of itself born of maturation, revealing the substance and function of grasping phenomena; ignorance regarding phenomena generally refers to other minds, such as not understanding deportment and crafts. Or again, not knowing the thickness or thinness of the great earth, the height or lowliness of the mountains, or the depth or shallowness of the great ocean—all these are ignorance regarding phenomena, but one does not necessarily firmly grasp them as having dharma-grasping. Furthermore, with respect to the two vehicles, subsequent dharma-grasping is of an indeterminate nature; just as when afflictions such as greed and anger arise, greed is itself greedy attachment, and there is attachment to phenomena that discerns antecedent phenomena, and anger and the rest are also like this: although they arise simultaneously, they have distinct natures of unwholesomeness and indeterminateness.