Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

瑜伽論記 2.183

English (machine translation) 2.183

Language
English

2.183

Regarding "If the characteristics are different, that the nature and characteristics are substantially existent is unreasonable": The syllogism is: The natures and characteristics of the past and future should not be substantially existent, because they are different from the present, just like the horns of a hare. Mahāyāna's tathatā is not definitively different from the present, so there is no fallacy of inconclusiveness (anaikāntika).

Linked texts (1)