瑜伽論記 2.183
English (machine translation) 2.183
- Language
- English
2.183
Regarding "If the characteristics are different, that the nature and characteristics are substantially existent is unreasonable": The syllogism is: The natures and characteristics of the past and future should not be substantially existent, because they are different from the present, just like the horns of a hare. Mahāyāna's tathatā is not definitively different from the present, so there is no fallacy of inconclusiveness (anaikāntika).
Linked texts (1)
- 瑜伽論記 — Classical Chinese