瑜伽論記 23.85

23.85

The tenth part explains the points of doubt. Master Jing states: From 'within the internal teaching and discipline' up to 'predicting that one has no rebirth': the Buddha constantly reproaches the arising of views of existence and non-existence, yet when disciples pass away, he sees their rebirth or non-rebirth. Also, from 'speaking of an ultimate, permanent self' up to 'is also as explained before': previously it was said that subsequently there are two causes capable of generating such a facsimile-true-Dharma view: first, internally, the personality view has not yet been permanently severed; second, based on this, falsely investigating the person who undergoes saṃsāra and its cessation. In order to sever such two kinds of causes, two true Dharmas are proclaimed as antidotes: that is, sequentially expounding impermanence and non-self with respect to all formations, and seeking the person of saṃsāra and cessation within the four alternatives, none can be found at all, whether relying on the conditioned or relying on the unconditioned, and so forth.