瑜伽師地論略纂 14.18

14.18

論云「若據不相離攝，具有七物，謂即此眼」等者，謂如一眼根所有七極微，同處同時不相障礙。如一眼根極微，如蒲桃果大，此中微細皆可容受餘之極微，如是展轉，乃至廣說於一聚中有彼七物。若據實言之，既無別極微體，何故得有七物耶？義曰：以即如蒲桃果色，是清淨色為眼用故名眼，乃至為觸用故名觸，皆別折至極微，故言一聚中有七極微，非實極微而有七物。此乃同處不相離第二也耶。如一通珠寶共放光明，一一光明不相障礙，此亦如是。如石磨為未，名和合不相離，即第一也。如〈本地〉第三卷解。如豆等聚，名相離不相離，第三色也。如餘處別文釋。不言法處六色第一等義物者，准外應知。

The treatise says: "If based on inclusion by non-separation, it possesses seven substances, namely this very eye," etc. This means that, for example, the seven subtle atoms belonging to a single eye faculty occupy the same locus at the same time without mutual obstruction. For instance, a subtle atom of the eye faculty is as large as a grape; within it, what is fine and minute can fully accommodate the remaining subtle atoms, and so on, turning successively up to the detailed explanation that within a single conglomerate there are those seven substances. If one speaks according to reality, since there is no separate substance of a subtle atom, why can there be seven substances? The meaning is: because the matter shaped like a grape is pure matter, serving the function of the eye, it is called "eye," up to: serving the function of touch, it is called "tangible"; each is separately broken down to subtle atoms, and therefore it is said that within one conglomerate there are seven subtle atoms, but it is not that seven substances exist as real subtle atoms. Is this not the second [kind], non-separation in the same locus? Just as an array of pearls collectively emits light, and each light does not obstruct another, this is also like that. Like stones ground into powder, this is called non-separation by combination, which is the first kind, as explained in fascicle three of the Maulī Bhūmi. Like a heap of beans and the like, this is called non-separation with separation, which is the third [kind of] matter, as explained in separate texts elsewhere. It does not speak of the six kinds of matter of the sphere of phenomena, the primary substance, and so on, which should be known by analogy with external things.