瑜伽師地論略纂 3.52

3.52

業中有五：一、如種子難，親所作故，應無常；二、如陶師難，別體成故，應非常；三、如神通難，有自在故，應無地獄貪瞋等生；四、如地難，無作所依，顯了業故；五、如空難，色無假立，無業用故。

Regarding action, there are five [arguments]: first, the argument by analogy with a seed—because it is directly produced, it should be impermanent; second, the argument by analogy with a potter—because it is accomplished as a distinct entity, it should not be permanent; third, the argument by analogy with supernormal powers—because there would be mastery, rebirth in narakas, greed, anger, and so forth would not arise; fourth, the argument by analogy with the earth—because it serves as a motionless basis and manifests actions; fifth, the argument by analogy with space—because it is designated in the absence of form, it lacks functional activity.