成唯識論述記 1.179

1.179

述曰：依初、二科，自下第二總解三句。下有三文：一、顯我、法皆假所由；二、遮增減執；三、二諦攝。准義可知依第二、三科。自下第二，解其二性皆假所由，遮增減執。此即先敘法體非有。以下之文唯是難陀、護法二說，無安惠解，以無內識所變我、法故。護法、難陀二義准解，謂諸愚夫虛妄所執，實我、實法都無所有，此但情有，理皆無故。若爾，如何前說為假？

The Commentary states: According to the first and second sections, from here below is the second [part], which generally explains the three lines. Below there are three passages: first, to reveal the reason why both self and dharmas are nominal; second, to refute the clinging to addition and reduction; third, subsumption under the two truths. By inference from the meaning, one can know that it is based on the second and third sections. From here below is the second, explaining the reason why both natures are nominal and refuting the clinging to addition and reduction. Here, it first recounts that the substance of dharmas does not exist. The text below represents only the two explanations of Nanda and Dharmapāla; there is no explanation of Sthiramati, because [for Sthiramati] there are no self and dharmas transformed by internal consciousness. By inference from the two positions of Dharmapāla and Nanda, it is explained: what foolish worldlings falsely cling to—real self and real dharmas—is entirely nonexistent, because these exist only in imagination, and in principle are entirely nonexistent. If so, why were they spoken of before as nominal?