成唯識論述記 1.243

1.243

述曰：此又重責，如天授解脫，餘亦應爾，作業、受果并各別身，與諸我合故，所修證法，彼此我合故，不可但說唯屬此我，非彼我故，一人解脫，餘不解脫。量云：且如天授，一解脫時，餘未解脫者，一切應解脫；所修、所證法一切我合故；猶如天授已解脫者，所修者行，所證者理。此破初計。文各有十，三比量。又以業、果、身為因，難解脫宗，亦得為量。

The Commentary states: This again rebukes them: when Devadatta is liberated, the others should also be likewise, because the creation of karma, the experiencing of the fruit, and the distinct bodies are united with all selves, and the dharmas cultivated and realized are united with both this and that self. Therefore, one cannot say that they belong only to this self and not to that self, such that one person is liberated while the others are not. The inference is: When Devadatta, as one person, is liberated, all the remaining unliberated persons should be liberated; because the dharmas cultivated and realized are united with all selves; just like the Devadatta who is already liberated. 'That which is cultivated' is practice; 'that which is realized' is principle. This refutes the first view. In the text there are ten and three inferences respectively. Furthermore, using karma, fruit, and body as the reason (hetu) to refute the thesis (pakṣa) of liberation can also form an inference.