成唯識論述記 1.304

1.304

述曰：諸師作、受計各不同。作用而言，作受、作用並計是有、有用。量云：我應無常；有作用故；如手、足等。若對數論，轉變如手等；若對吠世等，滅壞如足等。文勢雖合，義意不同。虛空、真如此無作用，故無不定。

The Commentary states: The various teachers posit agency and experiencership differently. Speaking of activity (kāritra), both agency and experiencership are posited as existent and having efficacy. The formal inference is: The self should be impermanent; because it has activity; like hands, feet, and so on. If addressed to the Sāṃkhyas, transformation is like hands, etc.; if addressed to the Vaiśeṣikas and others, disintegration is like feet, etc. Although the phrasing is combined, the meaning and intention differ. Empty space and tathatā lack activity, so there is no fallacy of inconclusiveness.