成唯識論述記 1.325

1.325

述曰：此曲結也，如《瑜伽》、《顯揚》十六。《大論》皆緣影像自心相分為所緣緣，無有一我是相分者故，是但緣識所變蘊，蘊各別故，故言諸蘊。即計此蘊種種計度，故與小乘所說有異。

The Commentary states: This is an indirect conclusion, as in the Yogācārabhūmi and the Prakaraṇāryavācā, fascicle sixteen. The Great Treatise states that in all cases they take the reflective image, the nimittabhāga of their own mind, as the objective condition (ālambana-pratyaya), because not a single self exists as a nimittabhāga. Thus it merely conditions the aggregates transformed by consciousness; and because the aggregates are distinct, it says 'the aggregates.' Taking these very aggregates, they engage in various conceptual constructions; hence this differs from what the Hīnayāna asserts.