成唯識論述記 1.366

1.366

述曰：此中敘計，准前可知。量云：汝之實我，前無受用事時，應有受用事；即後體故；如後位時。以後與前，體無別故者，通前及後，二難之因。次外人救。

The Commentary states: Here the imputation is recounted, which can be known following the above. The syllogism: 'Your real self, at the earlier time when the matter of enjoyment did not exist, should have the matter of enjoyment; because it is the substance of the later; just like the later state.' Saying 'because between earlier and later, its substance has no distinction' is the reason that applies to both the earlier and later objections. Next is the outsider's defense.