成唯識論述記 1.387

1.387

述曰：總結前非，述正義也，其文易解。就破外計，文總有四。其第三段別問答中，上來第一已破我訖，自下第二次破執法。於中有二：初破計；後解執。或有三：初總問答；次廣別破；後解法執。或分為四：第一，總問答；第二，別問答破；第三，合破小乘、外道；第四，解彼二執。或分為五：初外道、小乘略共為問，徵法非有；第二略答法體是無；第三外道、小乘別問、別破所取非有；第四，合破小乘、外道所、能取無；第五，解彼法執，分別、俱生伏斷位次。

The Commentary states: Concluding the preceding errors in general, this recounts the correct doctrine; its text is easily understood. Regarding the refutation of external imputations, the text has four parts in total. In the third section's separate questions and answers, above, the first has already finished refuting the self; here below, the second next refutes the grasp of dharmas. Herein there are two: first, refuting the imputation; later, explaining the grasp. Or there are three: first, a general question and answer; next, a broad and separate refutation; later, explaining dharmagrāha. Or it is divided into four: first, general question and answer; second, separate questions and answers of refutation; third, combined refutation of Hīnayāna and outsiders; fourth, explaining their two grasps. Or it is divided into five: first, outsiders and Hīnayāna briefly ask together, questioning that dharmas are nonexistent; second, briefly answering that the entity of dharmas is nonexistent; third, outsiders and Hīnayāna ask separately, and their grasped objects are refuted separately as nonexistent; fourth, combined refutation of Hīnayāna and outsiders that the grasped and the grasper are nonexistent; fifth, explaining their dharmagrāha, and the stages of suppression and severance, whether discriminative or innate.