成唯識論述記 1.522

1.522

述曰：如有性非是無法，有性無別有性有，實等亦非無，如何別有有？立量云：汝有性，應別有有性；許非無故；如實、德等。此中因有不定，同異亦許體非無，不許有有故。彼非極成，故無不定。又總取所難之中，此中簡過，如前應知。已下所有比量簡過，皆准可知，更不繁指。

The Commentary states: Just as the nature of existence is not a non-existent dharma, yet the nature of existence does not have a distinct nature of existence by which it exists, so substance and the rest are also not non-existent; why should they have a distinct existence? Formulating the inference: Your nature of existence should have a distinct nature of existence; because it is accepted as not non-existent; like substance, quality, and so forth. Here the reason has an inconclusiveness, because generality-particularity is also accepted as not being non-existent in substance, yet is not accepted as possessing existence. But since that is not mutually established, there is no inconclusiveness. Moreover, taking the challenged points collectively, the qualification of fallacies here should be understood as before. All subsequent qualifications of fallacies in the inferences are to be understood by analogy, and will not be pointed out repeatedly.