成唯識論述記 1.576

1.576

述曰：以上諸法皆是一物，是實常住法，具諸功能，生一切法，與大自在義相似故，合例為破。然以不如數、勝論等，別有熾盛多部類故，不標其名，各各別破。然勘《瑜伽》第六、七卷、《顯揚》十一、十二、十六、《大論》中及《廣百論》，方知此等外道名計。

The Commentary states: Because the dharmas mentioned above are each a single entity, are real and eternal dharmas endowed with all functional capacities to produce all dharmas, their meaning is similar to that of Great Maheśvara; hence they are refuted together by analogy. However, because unlike the Sāṃkhya, Vaiśeṣika, and others, they do not constitute prominent and numerous sectarian divisions, their names are not individually specified for separate refutation. Yet if one checks fascicles six and seven of the Yogācārabhūmi, fascicles eleven, twelve, and sixteen of the Prakaraṇāryavācā, the *Mahāvibhāṣā* (*Dālun*), and the Śataśāstra-vaipulya (*Guangbai lun*), one will then know the names and doctrines of these non-Buddhists.