成唯識論述記 1.622

1.622

述曰：此下第二，破所生果，體是實有。果既多分成麁，應非實有；多分成故；如軍林等。又汝所執前後相違，前言：果色子微一物雖麁，仍量等彼一因之微。既被難已，云：量德合；又復轉言：量等二因微；乃至今言：多分所成麁，元非一物。又多分成，復稱實有。故是前、後相違轉執。

The Commentary states: From this point onward is the second part, refuting that the produced effect is substantially existent in essence. Since the effect becomes coarse by being composed of multiple parts, it should not be substantially existent; because it is composed of multiple parts; just like an army or a forest. Furthermore, what you maintain contradicts itself from first to last. Previously you said: Although the child-atom of material effect is a single entity, it is coarse, yet equal in size to a single causal atom. Having been refuted, you said: It combines with the quality of magnitude. Then you shifted again and said: It is equal in size to two causal atoms. And now you say: It becomes coarse by being composed of multiple parts, and is fundamentally not a single entity. Moreover, being composed of multiple parts, you still claim it to be substantially existent. Therefore, these are shifted assertions that contradict each other from first to last.