成唯識論述記 1.640

1.640

述曰：此違自教及違世間。汝宗二十三諦自望雖無別，以體即自性故，而許三德及我四法有別。故論中言：三德及我。又汝三德及我四法皆應無差；即有性故；如二十三諦。二十三諦體無別故。若言一切悉皆無差，豈不自違宗意？又我等者，等二十三諦差別體相。又違世間現見可知。此破大有，即有三違：一、比量；二、自宗；三、世間。

The Commentary states: This contradicts their own doctrine and contradicts the worldly [consensus]. Although in your school the twenty-three principles (tattva) have no distinction with respect to each other—because their substance is identical with primordial nature (prakṛti)—you nonetheless allow that the four principles, namely the three guṇas and the self (puruṣa), are distinct. Hence the treatise says: "the three guṇas and the self." Furthermore, your four principles—the three guṇas and the self—should all be without distinction; because they are identical with the nature of being; like the twenty-three principles. This is because the substances of the twenty-three principles have no distinction. If you say that everything whatsoever is without distinction, how does that not contradict your own doctrinal intent? Furthermore, "the self and the rest" encompasses the distinct substances and marks of the twenty-three principles. It also contradicts what is visibly known in the world. This refutation of Great Being has three contradictions: first, [contradiction of] inference; second, [contradiction of] their own school; third, [contradiction of] the worldly [consensus].