成唯識論述記 1.678

1.678

述曰：即違世間有一、異物，謂青是一，與黃為異故。以雙非故，即無有法，便違自宗：色等有法，決定實有。一、異相違，非實有故，如何非一、異，豈色與色非一，與聲等非異？

The Commentary states: It contradicts the world having things that are one or different—namely, blue is one, yet different from yellow. By double negation, there would be no substantial entity, and it would contradict their own school: substantial entities such as form are definitely real existents. Since oneness and difference are contradictory and not real existents, how can they be neither one nor different? Could form and form not be one, or form and sound and the rest not be different?