成唯識論述記 10.192

10.192

述曰：謂無惑得與聖道俱，唯依分別二障種子立異生性，其種必不與見道俱，如何凡聖有俱成失？問：無間道起惑種不俱，過去已滅，未來未生，如何名斷？

The Commentary states: This means that no possession of affliction co-exists with the noble path; the nature of ordinary beings is posited solely upon the seeds of the two obstacles [arising from] discrimination, and its seeds definitely do not co-exist with the path of seeing. How could there be the fault of both ordinary being and noble one being accomplished together? Question: When the uninterrupted path arises, the affliction seeds do not co-exist with it; the past has already ceased, and the future has not yet arisen—how is it called 'severed'?