成唯識論述記 10.206

10.206

述曰：《解深密》、七十八等說「斷於二愚」，如文可解。諸業果等者，如次前「等」字，等取善趣之中分別所起別報業及果等。直言惡趣，攝不盡故。經中既言惡趣雜染者，雜染之言通善趣分別雜染故。前說無記，若斷緣縛修道所斷，今言彼果是不生斷，如緣起中說故，為此第二解。何故業果亦名為愚？

The Commentary states: The Saṃdhinirmocana, the seventy-eighth fascicle [of the Yogācārabhūmi], and so forth state, 'severing two kinds of ignorance,' which can be understood according to the text. 'The various karmas, results, and so forth': just as with the preceding character 'and so forth', this includes distinct ripening karma and results arisen from discrimination within the wholesome destinies. Merely stating 'miserable destinies' does not subsume them all. Since the sūtra speaks of 'defilement of the miserable destinies,' the term 'defilement' also applies to the discriminative defilements of the wholesome destinies. Previously it was said that neutral [dharmas], if severed by severing objective bonding, are severed by the path of cultivation; here it says that those results are severed by non-arising, as stated in the [explanation of] conditioned arising; hence this second explanation. Why are karma and results also called ignorance?