成唯識論述記 10.216

10.216

述曰：此中意說，初地實斷二障。今說異生性障，唯取所知障，不取煩惱，以世親《攝論》第七卷說：十種無明望二乘者非染污故。若取煩惱，即十無明通染污故。以無明即是十障品之愚，愚即無明故。何意不說初地無明許是染污，通二障種？

The Commentary states: What is meant here is that the first ground actually severs the two obstacles. Here, speaking of the obstacle of ordinary-personhood, it takes only the cognitive obstacle and does not take afflictions, because Vasubandhu's Commentary on the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, fascicle seven, states: with respect to [the followers of] the two vehicles, the ten kinds of ignorance are non-defiled. If it took afflictions, then the ten kinds of ignorance would be defiled. Because ignorance is the folly of the category of the ten obstacles, and folly is ignorance. Why is it not held that the ignorance of the first ground is defiled, encompassing the seeds of both obstacles?