成唯識論述記 10.266

10.266

述曰：《十地》云「微煩惱習障」，世親《攝論》云「麁相現行」，十地望前五地等說為細，世親及此論望後七地說為麁相，亦不相違。由前地觀四諦故有二染二淨，故障六地無染淨道；此地真如名無染淨，故緣彼道名無染淨，其緣起相望四諦為細，望後障故說此為麁。

The Commentary states: The Daśabhūmika calls this the 'obstacle of subtle affliction-impregnations'; Vasubandhu's Mahāyānasaṃgraha calls it the 'active manifestation of coarse marks'. The Daśabhūmika calls it subtle in comparison with the preceding five bhūmis and so on, while Vasubandhu and this Treatise call it coarse marks in comparison with the succeeding seventh bhūmi, so there is no contradiction. Because in the preceding bhūmi one contemplates the four truths, there are two defiled and two pure [truths], which obstructs the sixth bhūmi's path devoid of defilement and purity. The tathatā of this bhūmi is called 'devoid of defilement and purity'; therefore, the path taking it as an object is called 'devoid of defilement and purity'. The marks of conditioned origination are subtle compared to the four truths, but in comparison to subsequent obstacles, these are called coarse.