成唯識論述記 10.332

10.332

述曰：所障有異斷，亦有殊，此中障種無麁細者八十一品，亦與非想第九一類品攝，如斷善邪見非無九品，故成能熏。又解，所障既同，斷無前後，名無麁細。非九地所攝總是一品，如前第七識中已廣解訖。又，唯緣內境自地之境，境無麁細，無多品類，故名一品，非三界中總無麁細。

[The Commentary states:] Where what is obstructed differs, the severing is also distinct. Here, that the seeds of the obstructions lack coarseness and subtlety means they are not of eighty-one grades, but belong to a single category like the ninth grade of Neither-Conceptualization-Nor-Non-Conceptualization. Just as false views that sever the roots of goodness are not without nine grades, so they constitute perfumers. Another explanation: since what is obstructed is the same, there is no sequence in their severing, which is called "lacking coarseness and subtlety." It is not that across the nine grounds they are subsumed into a single grade altogether, as was already explained in detail above under the seventh consciousness. Furthermore, because they only take internal objects—objects of their own ground—as their cognitive objects, and the objects lack coarseness and subtlety and lack multiple grades, they are called a single grade; it is not that across the three realms there is entirely no coarseness or subtlety.