成唯識論述記 10.465

10.465

述曰：第四，外人復問：謂前說言所知障非縛斷，不得擇滅；不動無為、想受滅無為，亦非斷縛得於四無為中，是誰攝耶？四無為者，《五蘊論》說：一、虛空；二、擇滅；三、非擇滅；四、真如。《百法論》、《瑜伽》等說六，加不動、想受滅。《對法》、《顯揚論》說八，加三性真如，因此則廣。明無為義者，如前第二卷、《別抄》等解。

The Commentary states: Fourth, the opponent asks again: it was previously said that cognitive hindrances are not bonds and their severance does not attain cessation through deliberation; neither are the unconditioned of immobility and the unconditioned of cessation of perception and feeling attained through severing bonds—under which of the four unconditioned are they subsumed? Regarding the four unconditioned, the Pañcaskandhaka-śāstra lists: 1. space; 2. cessation through deliberation; 3. cessation not through deliberation; 4. tathatā. The Śatadharma-śāstra, Yogācāra, and others state six, adding immobility and cessation of perception and feeling. The Abhidharma-samuccaya and the Prakaraṇāryavācā state eight, adding the tathatā of the three natures; thus it is expanded. The clarification of the meaning of unconditioned is as explained earlier in the second fascicle, the Biechao, and elsewhere.