成唯識論述記 10.560

10.560

述曰：答有三義，此第一說。如來身、土離能、所分別、三七分別，絕名言戲論，非蘊、處、界有情等所攝，不可言此五根、此五境等。今《大般若》大有此文，今三論諸師多為此解，故不可以十五界等有漏為問。彼言有漏，明非佛身。《佛地》第一卷說，此師當第三義，彼亦無評。

The Commentary states: There are three positions in response, and this is the first explanation. The Buddha's body and land transcend subject- and object-discrimination as well as the twenty-one discriminations, and cut off conventional verbal proliferation; they are not subsumed under the aggregates, sensory bases, elements, sentient beings, and so forth, so it cannot be said that 'these are the five faculties' or 'these are the five sensory objects,' and so on. Now the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra contains many such statements, and many masters of the Three Treatises today give this interpretation; therefore one cannot challenge [this position] on the grounds that the fifteen elements and so forth are sāsrava. When that text says they are sāsrava, it clearly means they are not the Buddha's body. Fascicle 1 of the Buddhabhūmi[-sūtra-śāstra] says that this master represents the third position, and that text also offers no final judgment.