成唯識論述記 10.588

10.588

述曰：有為皆蘊，說一切法皆處、界攝。諸論通文，說十九界等，《無垢稱經》之所遮故，非如來根、境，非十八界等攝。此遮第一師計：如來根、境非界、處攝。若絕戲論故，非界等者，亦不應此頌說如來功德即無漏界，是善，是常，亦是安樂，亦不應名解脫身等，解脫身等既可名者故，蘊、處、界？理應可名。

The Commentary states: Everything conditioned is an aggregate, and all dharmas are said to be subsumed under the bases and elements. General treatises speak of nineteen elements and so forth, but because the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa-sūtra refutes this, it is not that the Tathāgata's faculties and objects are not subsumed under the eighteen elements and so forth. This refutes the first master's view that the Tathāgata's faculties and objects are not subsumed under the elements and bases. If, because they cut off verbal proliferation, they were not the elements and so forth, then neither should this verse state that the Tathāgata's virtues are precisely the anāsrava element, virtuous, permanent, and blissful, nor should they be named the liberation body and so on. Since the liberation body and so on can be designated, why should it not be reasonable that the aggregates, bases, and elements can also be designated?