成唯識論述記 10.666

10.666

述曰：以蘊、處、界三法因緣雜引生故，謂見分是心，相分非心，如第八相中根、境等，及六識所緣色等，以與見分非一類種生故。色、心等別，以不相違故，無漏所變相分法中有五蘊，亦如根等，即是相分純種，與見分無漏及性同也。與見雜種故，色、心蘊等亦各有異，乃至相應法，相分相望亦然。由識起相等，同不繫法，純種，唯無漏，作用法不同，雜種生色、心，不可有漏同無漏難。

The Commentary states: Because the three dharmas—skandhas, āyatanas, and dhātus—are heterogeneously induced and generated by causes and conditions: that is, the darśanabhāga is citta, whereas the nimittabhāga is non-citta, as with the faculties, objects, and so forth in the marks of the eighth consciousness, and the forms and so forth cognized by the sixth consciousness, because they are generated from seeds that are not of the same category as the darśanabhāga. Forms, mind, and so forth are different, yet because they are not contradictory, among the dharmas of the nimittabhāga transformed by the anāsrava there are the five skandhas, which are also like the faculties and so forth; that is, the pure seeds of the nimittabhāga are identical in being anāsrava and in nature with the darśanabhāga. Because they are heterogeneous seeds with respect to the darśana[-bhāga], the skandhas of form, mind, and so forth are also each different; this even applies to the mutual relation between associated dharmas and the nimittabhāga. Because marks and so forth are arisen from consciousness, they are alike in being unattached dharmas, pure seeds, solely anāsrava; yet their functional dharmas are different, heterogeneous seeds generating form and mind, so one cannot raise an objection equating the sāsrava with the anāsrava.