成唯識論述記 10.683

10.683

述曰：一、謂所執為實；二、謂親取心外境，依此故言迷執於境，此意可解。此第二師解唯識，《佛地》所無。為破執故雖為愚夫，非心之理豈佛非有？即前二師許有相、見分義，第三師解。

The Commentary states: First, they hold the conceptually constructed to be real; second, they directly grasp objects external to the mind. Based on this, it is said that they are deluded and grasp at objects; this intention can be understood. This second master's explanation of consciousness-only is not present in the Buddhabhūmi[-śāstra]. To refute their grasping, though it addresses foolish worldlings, how could the principle of non-mind not exist for the Buddha? Following the explanation of these two masters who accept the existence of the nimittabhāga and darśanabhāga, the third master explains: