成唯識論述記 2.118

2.118

述曰：自下第二、破無對色，即法處色。生起下文。此中二量：謂無對色定非實有；許色所攝故，色種類故；如有對色。前已破訖，故得為喻。又量云：或此定非實色；以無對故；如心、心所，心、心所法非實色故。

The Commentary states: Next is the second part, refuting non-resistant forms, which are forms belonging to the locus of dharmas (dharmāyatana). This introduces the text below. Here there are two formal syllogisms: Non-resistant form is definitely not truly existent; because it is accepted to be subsumed under form, being of the category of form; just like resistant form. Since [resistant form] was already refuted earlier, it can serve as the example. Another syllogism states: Or, this definitely is not real form; because it lacks resistance; just like citta and caitasikas, since dharmas that are citta and caitasika are not real form.