成唯識論述記 2.146

2.146

述曰：汝執此風設許有表，即通善惡，觸法不應通善惡故。風非表業，觸處攝故，如火、水等；若無此物，手等不能動；外草木等無此動因，云何能動？風定非此；非善惡故；如水等。若許風有善惡者不然；觸入攝故；如水等。

The Commentary states: Even if your posited wind were allowed to be manifest, it would encompass good and evil, but tangible dharmas should not encompass good and evil. Wind is not manifest karma, because it is subsumed under the locus of tangibles, like fire, water, and so forth. If there were no such entity, hands and so forth could not move; external grass, trees, and so forth have no such cause of movement, so how could they move? Wind is definitely not this; because it is neither good nor evil; like water and so forth. If one accepts that wind has good and evil, that is incorrect; because it is subsumed under the tangible base (sparśāyatana); like water and so forth.