成唯識論述記 2.17

2.17

述曰：恐有異計，亦說「極微無礙」，故今設破。又無方分名為「無礙」，薩婆多等亦名「無礙」。量云：汝之極微不能集成瓶等；以無礙故；如非色法；無為、不相應、心心所等，皆攝在喻中，亦無不定，若對薩婆多，因應改云：無方分；質礙故；不能一一可尋比量，正彼論文子細分段，亦准可知。

The Commentary states: Fearing there might be a divergent view that also says 'atoms lack obstruction', this refutation is now hypothetically raised. Furthermore, lacking spatial parts is called 'lacking obstruction', and the Sarvāstivādins and others also designate [atoms as] 'lacking obstruction'. The formal inference is: 'Your atoms cannot aggregate into pots and the like; because they lack obstruction; like non-material dharmas.' The unconditioned, non-associated [formations], citta, and caitasikas are all included in the example, so there is also no inconclusiveness. If aimed at the Sarvāstivādin, the reason should be changed to: 'Because they lack spatial parts, though having physical obstruction.' Since one cannot examine every single formal inference, by aligning carefully with the text's detailed division of passages, it may likewise be inferred.