成唯識論述記 2.220

2.220

述曰：何故於寶即假說成，非實有得？異生成就善、惡諸法，言有實得，量云：汝宗七寶應有實得得；契經說有成就言故；如善、惡等。汝善、惡法應無實得得；契經說有成就言故；如七寶等。又量云：善、惡等法應自在，故名成就；經有成就言故；如七寶等。此就他說。

The Commentary states: Why is it that regarding the treasures, accomplishment is spoken of metaphorically without a real acquisition, whereas when ordinary worldlings accomplish wholesome and unwholesome dharmas, you say there is real acquisition? The formal inference states: In your school, the seven treasures should be acquired through real acquisition; because the sūtra contains the word "accomplishment"; just like wholesome and unwholesome dharmas. Your wholesome and unwholesome dharmas should lack acquisition through real acquisition; because the sūtra contains the word "accomplishment"; just like the seven treasures and so forth. Another formal inference states: Wholesome, unwholesome, and other dharmas should be called "accomplished" because of mastery; because the sūtra contains the word "accomplishment"; just like the seven treasures and so forth. This is argued according to the other party's position.