成唯識論述記 2.468

2.468

述曰：論主破之。此中量云：貪等隨眠非不相應攝；名貪等故；如現行貪等。此中貪、嗔、癡一一為之。薩婆多隨眠是纏現行法，諸部之中此義最心麁也，我今大乘隨眠即是心、心所法，第八識中諸染污種，故以破之，非遮彼不相應，我即是相應，此非一、異故。

The Commentary states: The treatise master refutes it. The syllogism here is: The dormant afflictions of greed and so forth are not subsumed under the unassociated; because they are named greed and so forth; just like actively manifested greed and so forth. Here, greed, anger, and delusion are each argued individually. For the Sarvāstivādins, dormant afflictions are actively manifested entanglements (paryavasthāna); among all schools, this view is the coarsest in conception. We now in the Mahāyāna hold that dormant afflictions are simply mental factors and minds—the defiled seeds within the eighth consciousness. Therefore, we refute them; this does not mean that by rejecting their being unassociated, we make them [simply] associated [caitasikas], for these are neither identical nor different.