成唯識論述記 2.531

2.531

述曰：所現空相前後相似，無有改易，唯為一類豁虛空等相，故假說為無為，而理定無實有本質，此如《顯揚》第十八說。若有漏心所緣現相，多分苦諦所攝；若善、不善心等，亦集諦攝，論據多分但說苦諦。無漏心者，道諦所攝，實非是常，即是生滅、非生滅門，依他性攝。下三性中自有誠證。

The Commentary states: The manifested mark of space is similar from before to after, without change, being solely of a single category of vast and empty space and the like; therefore, it is nominally designated as unconditioned. But in principle it definitely has no real substantial basis. This is as explained in the eighteenth chapter of Prakaraṇāryavācā. If it is a mark manifested by an object of the defiled mind, it is mostly subsumed under the truth of suffering; if it is an auspicious or inauspicious mind, it is also subsumed under the truth of the origin—the treatise speaks only of the truth of suffering based on the majority. As for the undefiled mind, it is subsumed under the truth of the path, and is in fact not permanent; that is to say, it is subsumed under the dependent nature via the aspects of arising-and-perishing and non-arising-and-perishing. In the discussion of the three natures below, there is authentic proof for this.