成唯識論述記 2.549

2.549

述曰：遮化地部說，定有執故說為空，非言為空，而體即空，非空、非不空故。何故論中說實物有，即《瑜伽論》五法中說？

The Commentary states: It is spoken of as empty to refute the view of the Mahīśāsakas who assert that it definitely exists; it is not that by calling it empty its substance is itself empty, because it is neither empty nor non-empty. Why is it spoken of in the treatises as a real entity, as in the five dharmas of the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra?