成唯識論述記 2.656

2.656

述曰：就破似事、共法之中，上來已破依類不成，自下復破依實不成。於中有二：初破；後結。破中有二：初無共不成破；後在人非德破。此初也。等者，等取別性，此、彼等，隨其所應，猛、赤等德非共有故。此中總非，下顯非共。

The Commentary states: In the refutation of the resembling entity and the shared property, the above has already refuted that [the designation] is not established based on genus. Below, it further refutes that it is not established based on substance. In this there are two: first, the refutation; second, the conclusion. Within the refutation there are two: first, the refutation that it cannot be established without something shared; second, the refutation that it resides in man and is not a quality. This is the first. 'And the like' includes distinctness, posteriority, priority, and so forth, as appropriate. Because qualities such as ferocity and redness are not shared: this is a general rejection here, and below shows why they are not shared.