成唯識論述記 3.166

3.166

述曰：自下第二正破安惠、正量部等。量言：如緣青時，若心、心所上無所緣相貌，應不能緣當正起時自心所緣之境，此立宗也；許無所緣相故，因也；如餘所不緣境，喻也，或如餘人境。又量：我餘時緣聲等心，亦應緣今色；許無所緣相故；如今緣自青等之心，餘人亦爾。

The Commentary states: From here below is the second part, directly refuting Sthiramati, the Saṃmatīya, and others. The formal inference (anumāna) states: When cognizing blue, if citta and caitasikas lack the appearance of the cognized object, they should be unable to cognize their own cognized object when precisely arising; this establishes the thesis (pratijñā). Because it is admitted that they lack the appearance of the cognized object; this is the reason (hetu). Like other objects not cognized; this is the example (dṛṣṭānta), or like the objects of other persons. Another inference: My citta cognizing sound and so forth at other times should also cognize the present color; because it is admitted that it lacks the appearance of the cognized object; just like the present citta cognizing its own blue and so forth; for other persons it is also like this.